lang="en-US"UTF-8 How should the bridge factor be selected for strain gauges? class="post-template-default single single-post postid-3499 single-format-standard custom-background custom-background-image group-blog blogolife-3_0_7 unknown"

Prosig Support Blog

The place to come for support for Prosig's DATS, P8000 & PROTOR products

Prosig Support Blog
3499class="post-3499 post type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-p8000 tag-amplifier-gain tag-bridge-factor tag-calibration tag-excitation tag-strain-gage tag-strain-gauge tag-wheatstone-bridge"

How should the bridge factor be selected when using strain gauges?

fa fa-file-text-o

The number of active arms in a strain gauge Wheatstone bridge is known as the bridge factor.

As a simple guide when selecting bridge factors the following rules apply;

However, it is important to note that these simple rules only apply when the strain gauges are configured in a particular way.

The physical layout of the gauges affects the bridge factor.

If, for example, they are mounted in a transverse configuration for temperature compensation or are mounted on a shaft for torsional analysis then different, and more complex, rules can apply.

Traditionally, due to the nature of the small voltage changes associated with strain gauges any change in amplifier gain or change in excitation voltage should be followed by a calibration.

The following two tabs change content below.

James Wren

Former Application Engineer & Sales Manager at Prosig
James Wren was Sales & Marketing Manager for Prosig Ltd until 2019. James graduated from Portsmouth University in 2001, with a Masters degree in Electronic Engineering. He is a Chartered Engineer and a registered Eur Ing. He has been involved with motorsport from a very early age with a special interest in data acquisition. James is a founder member of the Dalmeny Racing team.

Share the knowledge:

James Wren

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Proudly powered byWordPressDesign byBlogoLife